Quantcast
Channel: What's the actual effect of successful unaligned accesses on x86? - Stack Overflow
Browsing all 4 articles
Browse latest View live

Answer by harold for What's the actual effect of successful unaligned...

On some Intel micro-architectures, a load that is split by a cacheline boundary takes a dozen cycles longer than usual, and a load that is split by a page boundary takes over 200 cycles longer. It's...

View Article



Answer by Analog File for What's the actual effect of successful unaligned...

In general estimating speed on modern processors is extremely complicated. This is true not only for unaligned accesses but in general.Modern processors have pipelined architectures, out of order and...

View Article

Answer by Necrolis for What's the actual effect of successful unaligned...

It depends on the instruction(s), for most x86 SSE load/store instructions (excluding unaligned variants), it will cause a fault, which means it'll probably crash your program or lead to lots of round...

View Article

What's the actual effect of successful unaligned accesses on x86?

I always hear that unaligned accesses are bad because they will either cause runtime errors and crash the program or slow memory accesses down. However I can't find any actual data on how much they...

View Article
Browsing all 4 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images